|
SD v. MMC Printed from: Neuros Forums Topic: Topic author: JoeBorn
Subject: SD v. MMC I'm still a little confused about compatibility between MMC and SD as it pertains to this discussion.
Replies:
Reply author: spudmonkey
quote: I don't think booting is the issue. If the closed source, proprietary bootloader loader can read SD, then you can boot from SD. The issue is with Linux. Ideally you would also like to use the SD to hold the Linux filesystem as well. In order to do that, however, you would have to an an SD driver in Linux. Since SD is a closed, specification, there is no open SD driver for Linux. There is, however, an open MMC driver. So I think the summary is: MMC: proprietary code can boot from it; open Linux can use it SD: proprietary code can boot from it; open Linux code cannot use it without a driver. Greg
Reply author: mrshoe Has a decission been made yet as to CF support?
Reply author: JoeBorn v1 of the 442 has SD. the 442 is quite far along, we are already beta testing it. CF is the likely choice for v2. quote: jborn (at) neurosaudio.com
Reply author: Yono So when the firmware is fully converted to linux, the SD slot will mostly be used with MMC cards? (if not always)
Reply author: spudmonkey
quote: I hope that is not the case in the long run. MMC cards are much slower: 20HMz x 1 bit transfer vs. 25MHz x 4-bit transfers. Potentially 5x slower. MMC cards are fine for development, but they may not could handle realtime streaming multimedia applications. Also, MMC cards are nearly obsolete are not as easy to find. Greg spudmonkey Neuros Forums : http://www.neurosaudio.com/community/forum/ © Copyright ©2002-05 Neuros Technology International, LLC all rights reserved. |