Neuros Forums
Home | Active Topics | Search | FAQ
 All Forums
 Gamma Forums
 Device Firmware & Interface
 Remote ideas
 Forum Locked
 Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

xenon(at)arcticus.com
Just Posting

8 Posts

Posted - 01/04/2005 :  5:31:08 PM  Show Profile
I had a couple of thoughts about a remote for the Neuros.

First, it'd be prtty easy to crack open the brain and solder extensions to the existing button pads, and bring them out on a micro DB9 or something. Pros: Doesn't require any software changes. Cons: Can't be deployed to other people easily. ;)

Second: I've been looking for an existing FM remote, or an existing FCC-licensed FM transmitter that could be driven to work as a remote. I couldn't find a real FM remote, but an idea occurred to me. I have a Belkin TuneCast 1, which has a stereo audio in and can transmit on one of four 88.x freqs. I suspect I could hook this up to a line-level tone or pulse generator, and generate tone or pulse patterns that the DSP on the NII could pick out of the noise, if it knew what frequency to listen on. Not sure if tones or pulses would be easier to decode. Pros: No hardware changes needed inside Neuros. Wireless. Cons: Requires firmware support. Requires battery power on transmitter. Hard to make into a real product, due to FCC licensing and such.

Third: Make a wired remote that patches into the MIC input on the Neuros and use pulse patterns generated by a tiny microcontroller (PIC?) to communicate button pushes to the Neuros. Pros: No hardware changes needed inside Neuros. No FCC/broadcast mess. pretty easy to make into a kit or product. Cons: Requires firmware support. Not wireless.

Comments?

Your quick response to this post: (0 total votes)
I agree (0%)
I disagree (0%)

Voyageur
Likes to Post

10 Posts

Posted - 01/05/2005 :  11:38:18 AM  Show Profile  Send Voyageur an ICQ Message
The third one looks quite interesting, FM band here is soooo crowded!

Voyageur, from France

Your quick response to this post: (0 total votes)
I agree (0%)
I disagree (0%)
Go to Top of Page

xenon(at)arcticus.com
Just Posting

8 Posts

Posted - 01/05/2005 :  2:04:35 PM  Show Profile
Another possibility I came up with was subverting the USB1 port on the Brain. In a USB2 unit (such as mine) you don't need the USB1 port, and my understanding is that it is implemented (almost?) entirely in software on the DSP. This means that potentially it could be reprogrammed to a different (simpler?) protocol such as a simple 9600bps async serial port. This would allow for a lot of new IO expansion options like a remote.

Does anyone with some familiarity with this hardware/software have any comments on the practicality of this?

Your quick response to this post: (0 total votes)
I agree (0%)
I disagree (0%)
Go to Top of Page

Chameleon
Posting Mania

1396 Posts

Posted - 01/06/2005 :  5:10:25 PM  Show Profile  Visit Chameleon's Homepage  Send Chameleon an AOL message  Send Chameleon an ICQ Message  Send Chameleon a Yahoo! Message
I read in some of the schematics or white paper documents that the Neuros already (at least theoretically) supports a remote transmitting in the less-than-FM-band frequency range... like less than 80 MHz.

Look into that before hacking through hardware.

-- 'I switched to Vorbis and saved a bunch on my hard-disk space!'

Your quick response to this post: (0 total votes)
I agree (0%)
I disagree (0%)
Go to Top of Page

xenon(at)arcticus.com
Just Posting

8 Posts

Posted - 01/06/2005 :  5:15:06 PM  Show Profile
quote:
Originally posted by Chameleon

I read in some of the schematics or white paper documents that the Neuros already (at least theoretically) supports a remote transmitting in the less-than-FM-band frequency range... like less than 80 MHz.



I think it can tune a wider range than the 'normal' FM dial. That's good, but the issue is still that anything with an FM broadcast circuit is gonna be an FCC mess to get approved, so it's not much of a hobbyist or kit kind of project. Unless we can find an already-certified device that can be trivially modified to become a remote -- even with that, any real modification may require FCC reapproval.

Does anyone know of another device using an FM remote? It would certainly be easier to co-opt someone else's protocol than to build a new device.

Your quick response to this post: (0 total votes)
I agree (0%)
I disagree (0%)
Go to Top of Page

Yono
Posting Mania

718 Posts

Posted - 01/06/2005 :  8:31:24 PM  Show Profile  Send Yono an AOL message  Send Yono an ICQ Message  Click to see Yono's MSN Messenger address  Send Yono a Yahoo! Message
This is all I've found so far, but I have confidence.

http://www.crimestopper.com/techweb/techbulletins/txchart/LCDtxchart.pdf
http://www.remotecontroltech.com/

Kinda unrelated:
http://www.engadget.com/entry/1234000150026399/

-- 'Microsoft Works is an Oxymoron'

Edited by - Yono on 01/07/2005 2:34:07 PM

Your quick response to this post: (0 total votes)
I agree (0%)
I disagree (0%)
Go to Top of Page

Yono
Posting Mania

718 Posts

Posted - 01/12/2005 :  09:24:10 AM  Show Profile  Send Yono an AOL message  Send Yono an ICQ Message  Click to see Yono's MSN Messenger address  Send Yono a Yahoo! Message
A RF remote has been created for an audio device (if you can even call it that). http://www.engadget.com/entry/1234000327026993/

-- 'Microsoft Works is an Oxymoron'

Your quick response to this post: (0 total votes)
I agree (0%)
I disagree (0%)
Go to Top of Page

sinclair_vital
Just Posting

3 Posts

Posted - 01/17/2006 :  08:01:15 AM  Show Profile  Visit sinclair_vital's Homepage
Hi

Newbie questions:

1) How do I open the unit to get into the inside.
2) I want to control the unit via serial or Bluetooth. Where is the serial interface inside?
3) What serial control protocol is in use?



Sinclair

Your quick response to this post: (0 total votes)
I agree (0%)
I disagree (0%)
Go to Top of Page

sinclair_vital
Just Posting

3 Posts

Posted - 03/12/2006 :  03:28:14 AM  Show Profile  Visit sinclair_vital's Homepage
quote:
Originally posted by xenon(at)arcticus.com

Another possibility I came up with was subverting the USB1 port on the Brain. In a USB2 unit (such as mine) you don't need the USB1 port, and my understanding is that it is implemented (almost?) entirely in software on the DSP. This means that potentially it could be reprogrammed to a different (simpler?) protocol such as a simple 9600bps async serial port. This would allow for a lot of new IO expansion options like a remote.

Does anyone with some familiarity with this hardware/software have any comments on the practicality of this?



If it can be done with the Recorder 2 I can help . Please let me know if you want to work on this?

Sinclair

Your quick response to this post: (0 total votes)
I agree (0%)
I disagree (0%)
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 Forum Locked
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
Neuros Forums Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000