| Author |
Topic  |
|
|
gomanred
Just Posting

3 Posts |
Posted - 12/03/2005 : 11:25:11 AM
|
Ok, I modified my listing. I need to record from a video camera for many days unattended. Is the Neuros the right product, or is the Neuros Recorder better.
I don't care about watching I just need to cram a camera and some media to write to into a security box that is cheap and easy to use.
Any advice?
|
Edited by - gomanred on 12/04/2005 01:06:02 AM
|
Your quick response to this post: (0 total votes) I agree (0%) I disagree (0%)
|
|
|
American Techpusher
Posting Mania
    
588 Posts |
Posted - 12/04/2005 : 03:12:24 AM
|
If it’s going to recording non stop I suggest the 442 because it has the hard drive unit which will have much more space to record to.
Keith Ashwood American Techpushers
www.americantechpushers.com |
Edited by - American Techpusher on 12/04/2005 03:14:27 AM |
Your quick response to this post: (0 total votes) I agree (0%) I disagree (0%) |
 |
|
|
FJ
Posting Profoundly
   
208 Posts |
Posted - 12/05/2005 : 12:09:01 PM
|
quote: Originally posted by gomanred
Ok, I modified my listing. I need to record from a video camera for many days unattended. Is the Neuros the right product, or is the Neuros Recorder better.
I don't care about watching I just need to cram a camera and some media to write to into a security box that is cheap and easy to use.
Any advice?
You have to know that for now, it will have a time limit, this limit comes from the file system. A single file can only go up to 4GB or 4 hours of recording time, depending on the recording quality. You can easily use the timer recording feature to program up to 3 recording of 4 hours. An algorithm can be written for continuous recording, but that will not happen before we launch the open source version of teh 442.
The recorder is using flash memory or microdrive, so you will be limited by the size of the microdrive you are using.
Johan Neuros
FJ |
Your quick response to this post: (0 total votes) I agree (0%) I disagree (0%) |
 |
|
|
gomanred
Just Posting

3 Posts |
Posted - 12/06/2005 : 11:53:14 PM
|
thanks for the info. My use is industrial more than recreational so being able to record for the size of the hard-drive is very important. Ultimately these units have a lot of use in industry, especially where you need to have video of what was going on.
Once open source hopefully it will be possible to write a script that compares frames and thows out ones where nothing changed thus saving hard-drive and increasing filming capacity.
Will keep your technology on the radar screen.
-eric |
Your quick response to this post: (0 total votes) I agree (0%) I disagree (0%) |
 |
|
|
FJ
Posting Profoundly
   
208 Posts |
Posted - 12/08/2005 : 09:35:56 AM
|
quote: Originally posted by gomanred
thanks for the info. My use is industrial more than recreational so being able to record for the size of the hard-drive is very important. Ultimately these units have a lot of use in industry, especially where you need to have video of what was going on.
Once open source hopefully it will be possible to write a script that compares frames and thows out ones where nothing changed thus saving hard-drive and increasing filming capacity.
Will keep your technology on the radar screen.
-eric
I see, well FAT32 limits the size of the files, but I am sure someody will come up with a solution once we have the open source firmware.
Johan Neuros
FJ |
Your quick response to this post: (0 total votes) I agree (0%) I disagree (0%) |
 |
|
| |
Topic  |
|