Oufff, I see I'm not the only one who think that the 442 should get a new firmware, not to see the hole ID3 it's very unpleasant and a changement would be welcome []
jscott1 you are right!!! To say that it has not enough power to change the user interface, it is the better way to make the 442 v2 more important! One interface is already in the 442 and it would nice if you could only change some visible problems an not the hole design with better quality so to say! And i would never pay an additional amount of money to get the 442v2 because there are so many concurrence out there that i can suggest you to go check it a little bit! There are so other marks bringing some nice stuff and i can say that they have nothing to do with the 442v2, so you can see what i mean with it ( they are really better )!
You don't understand ... i don't expect from neuro developpers to put the 442 v2 "abilities" on the 442 v1! The 442 has enough power to provider better things ... From my side i would only expect one thing ... a better platform and library shuffle because everyone have seen that there are some little problems ... ok you aren't forced to do that because i obviously already bought the 442 but it would e very nice and friendly if you could discuss and find a good solution for these problems! Just make us love our 442 more than we already do! ;-)
I'm a little bit unpleasured of the way that the developpers from neuro act!! One other firmware version is out!!! WOuaaaaw it's beautiful, but what brings it from new??? nothing !! Sure only things are fixed but not those that should be fixed! The 442 still don't play .mov format an the platform isn't very attractive! Why is neuros only caring about the new version of the 442! I think you could do i little bit more!! thankz
Show Posts
]