|
mbryner
|
 |
« on: February 16, 2011, 02:56:46 pm » |
|
Hello,
I notice there's not much activity in this forum and most of the wiki pages are quite out of date, too. Either everyone is very happy with their "gamma testing Link" or development has slowed. I hope it's the former because the Link looks like a great project and I'm very interested in getting one. A couple questions first before I order:
Background: I used to have a Neuros HDD music player (the one w/ the backpack) because it could play Ogg's, but sold it when I needed more capacity and the iPod's could use Rockbox. While I had the Neuros I was quite happy w/ it. Until a month ago, I had a Linux box running MythTV hooked into the cable system. Loved it. Before that, I had numerous Linux servers, and had experience in SCO Xenix, HP/UX, AIX, etc. Linux, open source software, etc. doesn't scare me, but I don't have a lot of time to play w/ bugs anymore so my wife and I each got Macbook Pros. About 1 month ago, we moved to our new off-grid house in the mountains about 15 miles outside town. High speed internet is by microwave link, unoptimized right now at about 6 Mbit. Since we are off-grid, every little bit of power use is noticed, especially in winter with clouds/snow/rain limiting solar output.
Can anyone tell me how much power (watts) the Link draws when in suspend mode? It should be close to zero for a good green product. Average power when running? (yes, I know the CPU says 45 watts) There are some nice little set-top media player boxes out there that do all the codecs I need, like Flac and Ogg, but all of them focus on video and leave the music interface primitive, unlike XBMC. The great thing about the Link is that it runs XBMC out of the box and does 1080p video (correct?). None of the set-top boxes can do Flash websites yet so the Link is a leg up on them.
Also, can the Link do RF remote control or Android/smartphone/browser remote control? Maybe that's a limitation of XBMC?
Thanks!
Marcus
|