<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by kcmark</i>
Why should we believe that Neuros will be any more responsive to user needs with the new 442v2 when it is apparent that there is comparatively little concern for EXISTING customers using the existing 442. <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
So far, they have taken all of the user comments posted in the dev group very seriously[1]. There have also been several scheduled IRC chats[2] with the people developing stuff. If you wanted to have input, you would have been welcomed. If you don't want to keep informed and just want to complain, I don't think Neuros or anyone else can do anything for you.
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">The 2 firmware upgrades have done VERY little to improve the usefullness of the 442 to the consumer, nor has Neuros mgmt given us any solid timetable as to when we'll get to upgrade our handicapped 442 for something better. <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
The current 442 was not developed by Neuros, it was repackaged by them from another company (search this forum for details). This means that they have only as much control over the current product as makes sense for them to pay for. At the moment it appears that it would cost them too much to develop those few features on this current dead-end system. The 442v2 looks to be shaping up very well so far from what I have been reading on the available resources.
I just posted my thoughts about the release date and what not in another topic[3].
[1]
http://groups.google.com/group/Neuros-DM320Hardware[2]
http://open.neurosaudio.com/search/node/irc[3]
http://forums.neurostechnology.com/smf/index.php?topic=7306.msg39082#msg39082l8rZ